组会记录（S09）Group-meeting log (S09)

本页是什么What this page is

按 UTC 日分块的组会记录：每天四部分 —— 成果（带信任状态）、工作、问题（含当天 agent 自己的错误与更正）、待 PI 决定。所有数字抄自来源文件，不做计算。被撤回或被红队改判的条目写它的新状态，不当作普通结果。

A group-meeting log in UTC-day blocks, each with four parts: Results (each with its trust state), Work, Problems (including the agents' own errors and corrections of that day) and Awaiting the PI. Every number is copied from the sources; nothing is computed. A withdrawn or red-teamed item is shown with its new status, not as a plain result.

2026-10-152026-10-15

• 成果：C2（PN+FXT，无 MOS2 外区谱）复核 —— 壁 kT 0.182 / 0.237 keV、O/Fe 低 10–45%、超压不变（MEASURED）。P1 氧预算、P2 晕静力学、P4 NGC 3073、P5 MCG 9-17-9、A1 能量审计、R1 红队全部完成。RT-01/RT-06：L7 由"测到 66 kpc"改为测到 ~55 kpc / 55–66 kpc 候选（CANDIDATE，含估计器 0.3–0.5 PW 与掩罩 0.47–0.59 PW 系统学后 2.0–2.9σ；66 kpc 外为上限 B < 0.75 PW）。RT-03：L9 边缘形状 MEASURED、3-D 空心烟囱 INFERRED。RT-05：L12 MEASURED → LIMIT。RT-07：L14 改写、L15 → CONDITIONAL。RT-09：L2b 改写（PN 无 MOS 式平面 < 0.17 PW/arcmin 2σ，径向标定未测）。RT-08：FXT 未渐晕加性项（0.5–1.3 keV 0.49 cts/pix，粒子模型 5×）。手册 H-N3079-001 建成并部署。Results: C2 (PN+FXT, outer spectra without MOS2) checked — wall kT 0.182 / 0.237 keV, O/Fe 10–45% lower, over-pressure unchanged (MEASURED). P1 oxygen budget, P2 halo hydrostatics, P4 NGC 3073, P5 MCG 9-17-9, the A1 energy audit and the R1 red team all done. RT-01/RT-06: L7 changes from "detected to 66 kpc" to measured to ~55 kpc / 55–66 kpc a candidate (CANDIDATE, 2.0–2.9σ with the 0.3–0.5 PW estimator and 0.47–0.59 PW mask systematics; beyond 66 kpc a limit B < 0.75 PW). RT-03: L9 edge shape MEASURED, 3-D hollow chimney INFERRED. RT-05: L12 MEASURED → LIMIT. RT-07: L14 reworded, L15 → CONDITIONAL. RT-09: L2b rewritten (PN shows no MOS-like plane < 0.17 PW/arcmin at 2σ; radial calibration untested). RT-08: the FXT unvignetted additive term (0.49 cts/pix at 0.5–1.3 keV, 5× the particle model). Handbook H-N3079-001 built and deployed.
• 工作：PI 派出 free-handoff 物理批次（P1–P5、A1、R1）；C2 复核并入 I021 L10/L11/L13；RT-01/02/03/05/06/07/08/09 分诊；手册阶段 1–3（结果、讨论、台账、§1/§2 占位、图修复）。Work: the PI dispatched the free-handoff physics batch (P1–P5, A1, R1); C2 folded into I021 L10/L11/L13; RT-01/02/03/05/06/07/08/09 triaged; handbook stages 1–3 (results, discussion, the ledger, the §1/§2 placeholders, figure fixes).
• 问题：合并 on-off 似然把 BG 每个 ON 区计一次（e079_fit.py:220），pooled kT/O/Fe 区间未校准；E098a 注入功率 vs 平均功率措辞（A1）；WWLM 区受 MCG 9-17-9 影响（P5）；RT-02 自报一个自己修掉的 bug，其"1σ 区间 1.4–3.3"实为 2σ 选项的叠加（标签错误）。Problems: the pooled on-off likelihood counts BG once per ON region (e079_fit.py:220), so the pooled kT/O/Fe intervals are uncalibrated; the E098a injection vs mean power wording (A1); the WWLM region is exposed to MCG 9-17-9 (P5); RT-02 reported one self-fixed bug, and its "1-sigma range 1.4–3.3" stacks 2-sigma choices (a label error).
• 待 PI 决定：论文 I 措辞 —— L12 作上限、L13 作"最佳拟合晕处超压"、L15 能量与延伸绑定；FXT 公共模径向标定（空白场/其他目标叠加）现牵动 L12/L13/L15/L16。Awaiting the PI: Paper I wording — L12 as a limit, L13 as "over-pressured at the best-fit halo", L15 energy tied to reach; the FXT common-mode radial calibration (blank-sky or other-target stacks) now carries L12/L13/L15/L16.

来源Source: cognition-os/06_AGENT_LOG.md rows 2026-10-15; cognition-os/sessions/2026-10-15.md; cognition-os/07_REVISION_LOG.md R001/R007–R012; cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md RT-01/02/03/05/06/07/08/09

2026-10-162026-10-16

• 成果：RT-10：L8 无帽成立，但作为 L15 约束是条件性的（帽亮 ~∝ n_H²，仅当 n_H(47) ≥ ~4.5e-5 排除 R 55–70 kpc 壳）；L20 保持候选（−1.0 PW）。RT-11：加性传播下 L12 2σ 上限 1.04–1.81e-4、平衡晕不被排除。RT-13：L10 → CONDITIONAL（C5 未过、误差仅统计；17–28 → 41–61 kpc 仅 +0.03 ± 0.03 keV，1.1σ；39 kpc 处 kT 突变未确立）。RT-12：倾向响应/渐晕误差（后被 R004 推翻）。R004 空白场检验（luna + codexnim 一致）：FXT 平软项判定为加性背景 —— 21 个空白高纬场 877 ks，b/粒子 5.33 ± 0.12（A）/ 5.07 ± 0.13（B）、逐场散差均值 γ 1.41 ± 0.12（A）/ 1.12 ± 0.09（B）（luna）与 1.25 ± 0.33（A）/ 1.54 ± 0.25（B）（codexnim）不低于 1、仅约 35–50% 预期 CXB 沿 v1.30 剖面；L12 取加性上限 1.04–1.81e-4、L13 最佳拟合 q ~1.3–1.8（响应误差情形 q ~2.0–2.1 降为敏感性）。RT-14：能量缺口仍在，可见风供 WSW 壁热能 1/7–1/14（响应误差情形 1/7–1/18）。15′ 凸起自 NNW 盘边（PA 345 +2.6 PW，72 扇区中排第 4，~1.4σ），小轴持平，不是帽证据。研究改用 research-cognition-os skill 0.3.1（新增 07_REVISION_LOG R001–R006、08_RUNNING、SCHEMA、PITFALLS，D30）。Results: RT-10: the L8 no-cap stands, but as an L15 constraint it is conditional (cap brightness ~∝ n_H²; excludes an R 55–70 kpc shell only if n_H(47) ≥ ~4.5e-5); L20 stays a candidate (−1.0 PW). RT-11: under additive propagation the L12 2σ upper is 1.04–1.81e-4 and the balance halo is not excluded. RT-13: L10 → CONDITIONAL (C5 open, stat-only errors; 17–28 → 41–61 kpc only +0.03 ± 0.03 keV, 1.1σ; the 39 kpc kT step is not established). RT-12: a response/vignetting error was favoured (later overturned by R004). The R004 blank-field test (luna + codexnim agree): the FXT flat soft term is settled as an additive background — 21 blank high-latitude fields, 877 ks, b/particle 5.33 ± 0.12 (A) / 5.07 ± 0.13 (B), field-scatter mean γ 1.41 ± 0.12 (A) / 1.12 ± 0.09 (B) (luna) and 1.25 ± 0.33 (A) / 1.54 ± 0.25 (B) (codexnim), neither below 1, and only about 35–50% of the expected CXB follows the v1.30 profile; L12 takes the additive upper 1.04–1.81e-4 and L13 the best-fit q ~1.3–1.8 (the response-error case q ~2.0–2.1 is demoted to a sensitivity). RT-14: the energy deficit survives, the visible wind supplying 1/7–1/14 of the WSW wall thermal energy (1/7–1/18 in the response-error case). The 15′ bump comes from the NNW disk side (PA 345 +2.6 PW, rank 4 of 72 sectors, ~1.4σ), the minor axis is level, so it is not cap evidence. The OS moved to research-cognition-os skill 0.3.1 (new 07_REVISION_LOG R001–R006, 08_RUNNING, SCHEMA, PITFALLS; D30).
• 工作：RT-10–RT-13 分诊；FXT 15′ 检验（8 个 45° 扇区 + 旋转扇区零假设）；空白场渐晕检验（codexnim + luna 双执行者）；I022 论文 I 措辞建议 v1（标注"建议（未经评审）"）；手册阶段 4–6（RT-08..RT-13 并入、§2 数据处理、wording 页、组会一页纸）；RT-14/RT-15 派出。Work: RT-10–RT-13 triaged; the FXT 15′ check (eight 45° sectors plus a rotated-sector null); the blank-field vignetting test (codexnim + luna dual); I022 Paper I wording suggestions v1 (labelled "Suggestion (not reviewed)"); handbook stages 4–6 (RT-08..RT-13 folded in, §2 data reduction, the wording page, the group-meeting one-pager); RT-14/RT-15 dispatched.
• 问题（当天 agent 自己的错误与更正）：R005 瞄准点偏移框架错误 —— "瞄准点偏北 2.3′ 预测 15′ 南北不对称反号"用了错误坐标系（RA_PNT 是 24 个 ObsID 的指向记录，渐晕以光轴为中心；84 个成图 ObsID 的核到光轴偏移为 0.2–0.76′，中值 0.5′），该论证已从全站删除。Claude 的图与图注修复被回退 —— 按 1.0.0/1.1.0 规则 Claude 不得改页面，它先修了 fig_fxt15 标签重叠与图注范围（10–24′ → 4–24′）并部署 71e35f95，随后回退这两处编辑、只带 banner 重建部署副本为 818cc236，修复转入阶段 7 清单。Hermes 的 2.5 h 图循环 —— 阶段 7 在 fig_fxt15 标签位置上耗时约 2.5 h 而无 HTML 改动，被 SIGINT 中断后改为"页面优先"恢复。冷启动演练发现的陈旧行 —— codexnim 35 min 读 21 个文件，23 处缺口 / 9 个 A 级：A 级已修（07 回填 R007–R012、I021 L12/L13 陈旧行标记、E084 banner、信任行 107/109、RT-11/12 队列、session NEXT、部署 id、漂移注记）；B/C 级 G10–G13、G18–G20、G22 仍开。Problems (the agents' own errors and corrections of the day): the R005 aim-offset frame error — "the aim point 2.3′ N predicts the opposite sign for the 15′ N-S asymmetry" used the wrong frame (RA_PNT is the pointing record of 24 ObsIDs and vignetting is centred on the optical axis; over the 84 map ObsIDs the nucleus-to-optical-axis offset is 0.2–0.76′, median 0.5′), so the argument was deleted site-wide. Claude's figure and caption fix was reverted — under the 1.0.0/1.1.0 rules Claude may not edit pages; it first fixed the fig_fxt15 label overlaps and a caption range (10–24′ → 4–24′) and deployed 71e35f95, then reverted both edits, rebuilt the deploy copy with the banner only as 818cc236, and the fixes moved to the stage-7 list. The 2.5 h figure loop of Hermes — stage 7 spent about 2.5 h on fig_fxt15 label placement with no HTML edits, was stopped with SIGINT and resumed "pages first". The stale rows found by the cold-start drill — codexnim read 21 files in 35 min and found 23 gaps / 9 severity A: the A gaps were fixed (07 back-fill R007–R012, stale-row markers on I021 L12/L13, the E084 banner, trust rows 107/109, the RT-11/12 queue, session NEXT, the deployment id, a drift note); the B/C gaps G10–G13, G18–G20, G22 stay open.
• 待 PI 决定：FXT 平软项是加性背景还是响应（渐晕）误差？选项：FXT 空白场叠加、CALDB 团队、或带 CXB 先验的联合拟合；在此之前引用 L12 阶梯与 L13 为 CONDITIONAL。论文 I 标题/措辞（I021 D5；I022 选项 A 建议）。FXT/CALDB 离轴渐晕验证（是否联系 FXT 团队）。Awaiting the PI: is the FXT flat soft term an additive background or a response (vignetting) error? Options: FXT blank-field stacks, the CALDB team, or a joint sky+flat+halo fit with a CXB prior; until then quote the L12 ladder and L13 as CONDITIONAL. The Paper I title/wording (I021 D5; I022 option A recommended). An FXT/CALDB off-axis vignetting validation (whether to contact the FXT team).

来源Source: cognition-os/06_AGENT_LOG.md rows 2026-10-16; cognition-os/sessions/2026-10-16.md; cognition-os/07_REVISION_LOG.md R002–R006/R012–R013; cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md RT-10/11/12/13/14/15

2026-10-17（到目前为止）2026-10-17 (so far)

• 成果：RT-16 + RT-19（R014 + R016）：a/a_CXB 缺口 未解释（UNEXPLAINED）—— 同一口径（1.3–2.0 keV、10–24′、同一 ARF 滤镜、同一 CXB）下 NGC 3079 为 −0.012 ± 0.023，空白场为 +0.30 ± 0.04（A）/ +0.28 ± 0.04（B）；点源扣除值 0.24，但主导源是真的（一个 199σ 的 Chandra 点源，cid 134，承担环内源计数 66%），源模型处于其 χ² 最小值处，所以缺口不是源模型的错误；不要引用 NGC 3079 的通用硬带 a/a_CXB。RT-17（R015）：FXT-B 探测器偶极 不是 12–17′ 南北不对称的解释 —— 预测 N−S 差 +1.12 ± 0.14 PW 对实测 +2.72 PW（比值 0.41），按 roll 分组在 5.1σ 否证符号、相位旋转在 12.5σ / 18.3σ 被否证；该不对称在天球框架下相干但只有 1.8–1.9σ，仍是候选。RT-18（R017）：加性情形下 L14 1/10.4–1/14.6、L13 在最佳晕（1.0e-4）13/13 bin q > 1、在 2σ 晕（1.8e-4）仅 4 个外 bin 保持 q > 1（1.02–1.65），内 9 个 bin 0.62–0.92，平衡晕被允许。Results: RT-16 + RT-19 (R014 + R016): the a/a_CXB gap is unexplained (UNEXPLAINED) — on the same footing (1.3–2.0 keV, 10–24′, the same ARF filter, the same CXB) NGC 3079 gives −0.012 ± 0.023 against the blank fields' +0.30 ± 0.04 (A) / +0.28 ± 0.04 (B); the point-source subtraction is worth 0.24, but the dominant source is real (a 199σ Chandra point source, cid 134, carrying 66% of the source counts in the ring) and the source model sits at its χ² minimum, so the gap is not an error of the model; do not quote a generic hard-band a/a_CXB for NGC 3079. RT-17 (R015): the FXT-B detector dipole is not the explanation for the 12–17′ north-south asymmetry — the predicted N−S difference is +1.12 ± 0.14 PW against an observed +2.72 PW (ratio 0.41); a split by roll rejects the sign at 5.1σ and the phase rotation is rejected at 12.5σ / 18.3σ; the asymmetry is sky-frame coherent but only at 1.8–1.9σ, so it stays a candidate. RT-18 (R017): in the additive case L14 is 1/10.4–1/14.6, L13 has q > 1 in 13/13 bins at the best halo (1.0e-4) and only in the 4 outer bins at the 2σ halo (1.8e-4) (1.02–1.65), the inner 9 bins 0.62–0.92, so the balance halo is allowed.
• 工作：RT-16/17/18/19 分诊并各自由 Claude 重跑（json 一致）；手册阶段 7 评审 + 部署 c74cf5bf；阶段 8b（三处文本编辑：RT-17、RT-16/19、γ 改为逐场散差均值）验证后部署 15621828；阶段 8d 验证；RT-20/RT-21 派出；8 小时刷新 tick。Work: RT-16/17/18/19 triaged, each replayed by Claude (json identical); handbook stage 7 reviewed and deployed as c74cf5bf; stage 8b (three text edits: RT-17, RT-16/19, γ replaced by the field-scatter means) verified and deployed as 15621828; stage 8d verified; RT-20/RT-21 dispatched; the 8-hourly refresh tick.
• 问题（当天 agent 自己的错误与更正）：F023 —— Hermes 的乱码回合：阶段 7 写完 results/claims/intro_data/index/wording/discussion 后进程死亡，出现乱码回合（上下文压缩后自称 "I'm Claude, an AI assistant made by Anthropic"，946 条消息）；评审仍 PASS（带 banner）。阶段 8 早死：新会话 20 min 即报 "This conversation is from a previous session that has ended..."，仅 177 条消息（非长上下文情形），未写任何 HTML，改用更窄的提示词重启（8b）。阶段 8c 早死：28 次调用后以幻觉的用户回合作结，改为 8d 两处单行编辑。NIM F024：RT-18 进程 17 次重连。Problems (the agents' own errors and corrections of the day): F023 — the garbled Hermes turns: stage 7 wrote results/claims/intro_data/index/wording/discussion and then the process died with a garbled turn (after context compaction it said "I'm Claude, an AI assistant made by Anthropic", 946 messages); the review still returned PASS with a banner. Stage 8 died early: the new session reported "This conversation is from a previous session that has ended..." after 20 min at only 177 messages (not a long-context case), wrote no HTML, and was relaunched with a narrower prompt (8b). Stage 8c died early: after 28 calls it ended with a hallucinated user turn, and was relaunched as 8d with two one-line edits. NIM F024: the RT-18 process had 17 reconnects.
• 待 PI 决定：是否联系 FXT 团队/CALDB 做离轴渐晕验证（论文 I 投稿前）；论文 I 标题/措辞（I021 D5，I022 选项 A 建议）；D1–D4；加性情形下 L13/L14 的措辞（R017 数字待写入 I022 与手册 L13/L14 文本）。Awaiting the PI: whether to contact the FXT team/CALDB for an off-axis vignetting validation (before Paper I submission); the Paper I title/wording (I021 D5, I022 option A recommended); D1–D4; the L13/L14 wording for the additive case (the R017 numbers are still to be written into I022 and the handbook L13/L14 text).

来源Source: cognition-os/06_AGENT_LOG.md rows 2026-10-17; cognition-os/07_REVISION_LOG.md R014–R017; cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md RT-16/17/18/19/20/21; cognition-os/08_RUNNING.md (F023, stage 8/8c deaths, F024)